Search for: "Myers v. Pfizer, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2009, 9:59 am by Karen E. Keller
12/2: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Novartis Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 10:10 am by Gregory B. Williams
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and Pfizer Inc. and 32 similar actions, Civil Action Nos. 17-609-LPS through 17-641-LPS, (D.Del. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 48. [12] See Free World Trust, supra, at paragraph 13; Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation Ltd, 2002 SCC 77 at paragraph 37, [2002] 4 SCR 153; AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2017 SCC 36 at paragraph 39, [2017] 1 SCR 943 [13] See Free World Trust, supra, at paragraphs 33–43; applied in Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 5:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
").CaseBRISTOL~MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and PFIZER INC v, Mylan ["MPI"], 2017 U.S. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:57 am
The cases, both on alleged failure to warn of the risk of suicide, include one against Glaxo over Paxil and one against New York-based Pfizer Inc. over Zoloft. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
Immunocorp (PATracer) Lipitor (Atorvastatin) – US: Complaint filed in Delaware - Infringement of US patent following Paragraph IV challenge: Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:45 am
INPI (EPLAW) Lyrica (Pregabalin) – US: Patent infringement complaint filed following a Para IV certification: Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Pfizer, Inc., 716 F.3d 1087, 1092-93 (8th Cir. 2013). [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:19 am by Kelly
(IP Whiteboard) Australia: A tale of four amendment requests: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc., 783 F.Supp. 1466, 1475 (D. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:37 am by Kelly
General Global pharmaceutical linkage regulations: A consortium framework (IP Osgoode) Pfizer rolling out generics to grab off-patent market (GenericsWeb) Australia: Too little too late: CSL Limited v Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (No 2) and the judicial discretion to amend a patent (IP Whiteboard) Brazil: You lost your chance! [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Plough, Inc., 863 P.2d 167, 177-78 (Cal. 1993); Patton v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Plough, Inc., 863 P.2d 167, 177-78 (Cal. 1993); Patton v. [read post]